Sintel, the Durian Open Movie Project » Blog Archive » Facial Shapes Test

    

Facial Shapes Test

on November 3rd, 2009, by angela

blog_facial_screenshot1

blog_facial_tests

My presentation at Blender Conference included facial topology for animation use, as well as demonstrating a series of facial shapes on our test model.

A bit about my work flow: I start by creating the full symmetrical shape, ensuring natural progression from default shape (0) to full key shape (1). The next step is ensuring proper mixing of shapes. Much tweaking is spent on the more subtle details. Once the shape is completed, I weight paint to break up left/right side to allow asymmetrical expressions.

In his recent post, “Development Update #2” , Brecht describes some of the development work that has gone into improving work flow efficiency.

Here’s the .blend

Enjoy!

Angela

41 Responses to “Facial Shapes Test”

  1. dd Says:

    wow……. thank…… πŸ™‚

  2. NIK Says:

    Really nice, great work.

  3. massile Says:

    Which build should I use to run this .blend file ? It doesn’t work with mine….

  4. D Says:

    It’s brilliant. πŸ˜€

    Although, when the mesh moves to draw her eyebrows upward, doesn’t it look like her underlying bone structure has deformed as well?
    It’s hard to tell from here, but it hopefully wont be noticible when it comes to Sintel. I had noticed that the brows greatly deformed in that way in the characters of your (Angela) demo reel, and I was just hoping that Sintel will be a little more realistic than those. πŸ™‚

  5. s0ndeb0k Says:

    Awesomeness!! Thanks Angela!

    @massile I had success with 1138_r23924-win32 from graphicall.org – 2.49 didn’t work for me

  6. massile Says:

    s0ndeb0k —> Thanks you very much….. woow that rocks !!

  7. Loken Says:

    Gah, I love the look of her, even if that is only the test model. Her mouth is so cute.

    Great work Angela!

  8. bydesign Says:

    D, I appreciate realism just like you do, but in any animated feature a decision has to be made about where on the continuum of realism and stylized the look should be. For example, you wouldn’t criticize a Pixar masterpiece because the bone structure of the face wasn’t correct. The most important thing is does it communicate and is it believable. This character definitely has those qualities. Great work, duran team!

  9. Month3d Says:

    Wow cool angela, is this the same model you showed us on the blender conference? or did you do some more improvements?
    Anyway cool stuff πŸ˜€

  10. Nixon Says:

    yay thx for sharing that awesome work!
    …the facial animations have a great nice look to them.
    I’m not very familiar with facial animation yet but i’ll try to learn from sources as these as much as I can, so this is really appreciated.
    Hope the whole team is doing fine, best regards and thanks a mile!

  11. Ovidiu Says:

    I don’t remember who said it from your side (on a previous new post) ~”we have a girl and she’s gorgeous”… I’m looking to those 6 faces and she is sooo cute!
    Great job, Angela!

  12. Cris Polecat Says:

    Amazing… no words…! The model is freakin’ awesomeeeeeee!

    CRiS

  13. qxfx Says:

    I like it very much. I hope someday I will be able to make a model like this.

  14. edi Says:

    She is really beautiful.

  15. Glenn Melenhorst Says:

    Hey Angela,
    Nice work with the model. Have you used ARTNATOMY? http://www.artnatomia.net/uk/artnatomyProgram.html
    It’s a great reference for muscle groups and how they affect face shapes, and also what combinations of muscles are used in particular emotions.
    Just thought you might find it useful. Here at work we only ever sculpt the muscle groups then use them in combinations to create our combinations of shapes.

    ~Glenn

  16. Anon Says:

    Quick Question is somebody doesn’t mind… is there a way I can turn off it automatically showing me the shape keys at 1.000 when I click them, even when there at 0.000, and forcing me to go forward one frame and go back to unshow it? it makes animating a complete pain in the neck

  17. kram1032 Says:

    I’m not sure but I think I already said that before…

    If that’s just the test character, I can’t wait to see Sintel’s actual final mesh πŸ˜€
    (And of course all the other stuff like rigs, textures, ……….)

  18. Hperigo Says:

    wow!!

    that looks great, how long did you took to model that?

    see ya..

  19. -jay- Says:

    Thanks for the .blends, its really great to be able to play with the Durian stuff already!

  20. MTracer Says:

    I like the way she looks, sort of a modest, non-sexy average girl. She’s pretty, but in a way that gives a nice fuzzy feel inside. Not like some models that make you stare at them, but then you think, “What barf did I just inhale?”, and feel really dumb about.

    Great work!

  21. panzi Says:

    I have to say, I like the face of this 3D model *MUCH* more than the face of the 2D painting. I hope no one feels offended by that, but I don’t like the painting. I know that the one painted it is capable of much better paintings.

  22. kamilo Says:

    yo creo que simular los sentimientos
    es la tarea mas importante…
    esto hace que el espectador sueΓ±e
    crea que esta en un mundo donde este es el observador directo
    los felicito de verdad esperon que sigan asi
    nos vemos chao

  23. Rudiger Says:

    OK, David’s Concept Art post was enough to get me to pre-order the DVD, now this post is going to get me to download Blender 2.5 and have a play myself. Just a gorgeous model and with such great, clean topology too!

    I was just wondering how you actually sculpt each shape key though. Do you just move around the control mesh point by point or do you do any brush sculpting?

  24. ndee (Andreas) Says:

    Hi Angela,
    first of all great Model! I really love the facial ShapeKeys!!! I think this is a great Reference for me!!!
    I have one concern about your Charakter. I hope this may help you. The Face works great in ortographic view!! The Proportions are really nice formed and her Face is just cute! Switching to perspective view the here Charakter looses a lot of her cutieness(don’t know if this word exists ^^). Here Face pops out to strong I think. Even if I zoom out alot. I don’t know if you understand what I mean. I think you’ve modeled there Charakter in ortographic view. Maybe you should switch from time to time to perspektive and compare both results and maybe adjust some proportions.

    I think this will not be the final Charakter, so maybe this can help.
    I am really excited about your work that will come!! Good luck with your further progress!!

    Andreas

  25. D Says:

    (Shh, bydesign! I’m trying to inject some stimulus into the project! πŸ˜€ If you’re saying it’s wrong to sail some constructive critisism around, no matter how irrelevant, then I disagree.)

    I looked at the shapes myself, but it doesn’t look too bad!
    http://i38.tinypic.com/fjdg60.jpg
    Even though I’m no expert on this stuff, I wouldn’t imagine modifying the shape mesh a little bit would be overly difficult, if not tedious. I might have suggested pushing the green outline of the raised eyebrow in the picture out a bit more toward the original orange shape where the brow bone would still be, and soften the green hump of her raised eyebrow back a bit, instead probably distributing more of the bunched up flesh to above her eyebrow.

    Everything I say here are only suggestions, and are concerned with details. No one would reasonably expect every detail to be perfect. I wouldn’t be bothered if Sintel affects the rubber face look! I just want to see a good movie! πŸ˜€

  26. D Says:

    @ndeeAndreas (By the way, I love your Durian fanart! The lighting!),

    When you say her face pops out too strong, do you think it has to do with her cheeks like I described on an earlier comment?
    http://durian.blender.org/news/simple-character-modeling-test-in-25-not-our-actual-character/#comment-1760
    I was beginning to think it was just me who noticed…

  27. angela Says:

    Thanks everyone for your encouraging feedback! πŸ™‚

    @ Month3d: This is the same model from the blender conference

    @ Glenn Melenhorst: Yes, Artnatomy is very useful resource. Two book I highly recommend:
    – “The Artist’s Complete Guide to Facial Expression” by Gary Faigin, for fundamentals
    – “Stop Staring: Facial Modeling and Animation Done Right” by Jason Osipa, for practical 3d animation application

    @ Anon: Perhaps you have “pinned” button activated? Having this button activated always show the current shape for this object. It’s the pushpin button just below the shapes list box.

    @ Hperigo: About a week. Purpose of this test model has been more-so dedicated to development work to improve 2.5 tools and work flow, and not so much final product.

    @ Rudiger: I move the control mesh point by point, using proportional. No sculpt used for this model.

    @ ndee (Andreas): Camera lens is currently set at its default, 35 – good for full shots, but gives a fishbowl effect on closeups. For closeups, try adjusting the camera lens to 85-90. Hope this helps!

  28. Dennis Says:

    It’s nice, very nice. But I think it’s too realistic compare to the concept art. I like to the style of concept and I feels like some of it case but lost during the 3d translation. That’s my opinion. Anyway, nice to see progress!

  29. Dennis Says:

    Corrected version of my previous comment*

    “It’s nice, very nice. But I think it’s too realistic compare to the concept art. I like the style of concept very much and I feel like some of it has been lost during the translation into 3D. That’s my opinion. Anyway, nice to see progress!”

  30. Ganny Says:

    Nice work!

    Also a minor (good) detail, the materials of the viewport look really nice. They seem pleasant to work with, and make the ediit mode selections very clear.

  31. dd Says:

    @angela :http://www.face-and-emotion.com/dataface/facs/description.jsp

    (FACS)Facial Action Coding System
    Facial Expressions, Emotion Expressions, Nonverbal Communication, Physiognomy

  32. MeshWeaver Says:

    very cool πŸ˜€ downloading the blend of course πŸ˜€

    thanks!

  33. MeshWeaver Says:

    shoot, just realized this is a 2.5 blend… i actually tried opening it with 2.49b! lol

    well, i’ll keep it until a more stable 2.5 is out. πŸ˜€

  34. hperigo Says:

    ehehe
    Test model look’s great! realy!

    bye

  35. BlendNmix Says:

    Very impressive… how Durian team will make believe that this “baby” will kick the dragon’s ass? :p

  36. Lancer Says:

    Nice subtle expressions there.

    I’m interested in the workflow where you used weight paint to create asymmetrical expressions… sounds like a simple technique which would be very time saving; how did you do it?

  37. Ovidiu Says:

    @BlendNmix: if she is saving the dragon’s baby I guess she will not fight with the momy-dragon at all … πŸ˜€
    My assumption is that she will return the baby to cool down the mighty dragon, ehehe

  38. angela Says:

    @ Dennis: This test model is not Sintel, and is not based on final concept of Sintel.

    @ dd: thanks for the link πŸ™‚

    @ Lancer: our DVD’s will include tutorials. In the meantime, Tony Mullen describes the technique in his book, “Introducing Character Animation with Blender”, Chapter 5: Shape Keys and Facial Rigging – Asymmetry.

  39. ndee (Andreas) Says:

    @angela
    thanks for explaining. I used always the default lens settings. Learned here something! Thanks πŸ˜€

    So my critique is been solved ^^

  40. Chris Says:

    I downloaded the blend and had fun playing with it. I thought I could show you one of the results: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2611/4078930643_5a58e0b7dc_b.jpg

    Keep up the wonderful work.

  41. Ramon miranda Says:

    Beautiful gestures and model . good job Angela. i am Fan of you.wanna see more developed ideas. and if you want i can Draw some sketches for you if you have ideas to model but not time to conceptualize them.

    bye.